A review of four deadly force cases, each with a unique set of circumstances that tested the boundaries of Stand Your Ground laws. Each also raises questions about where the line is drawn between legitimate fear and vigilantism.
Is the use of deadly force justified when the attacker has no weapon and doesn't touch the person who feels threatened? If an intruder has been subdued, is shooting him or her justified? Can a person chase someone down and then claim self-defense? Are Stand Your Ground laws necessary or were existing laws enough?
Read »

Recent comments
13 hours 27 min ago
1 day 13 hours ago
1 day 13 hours ago
1 day 13 hours ago
1 day 13 hours ago
1 day 13 hours ago
2 days 3 hours ago
2 days 9 hours ago
2 days 12 hours ago
5 days 14 hours ago