<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.freetalklive.com"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
 <title>Free Talk Live - Published news - Social Security</title>
 <link>http://www.freetalklive.com/SocialSecurity</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Feds harass website owners because of linked sites.</title>
 <link>http://www.freetalklive.com/content/feds_harass_website_owners_because_linked_sites</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;If a website violates Section 1140, and you link to it, your site violates Section 1140, and are liable for $5000 civil penalty for every click on that link; and so every website linking to your website would also be in violation, and so on, even if you have a commercial ad server company running the ads on your site and cannot click them because that would be cheating. besides, if a website convincingly pretends to be Feds and you do click the link, how would you know they&#039;re not?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.freetalklive.com/content/feds_harass_website_owners_because_linked_sites#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.freetalklive.com/category/media_type/news_article">News Article</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freetalklive.com/category/category/bureaucracy/social_security">Social Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freetalklive.com/category/additional_keywords_and_tags/social_security">social security</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 23:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>SomebodySmart</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27322 at http://www.freetalklive.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Circuit Rejects Demand for Fewer Benefits</title>
 <link>http://www.freetalklive.com/content/circuit_rejects_demand_fewer_benefits</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Senior citizens who receive Social Security benefits cannot refuse their entitlement to Medicare Part A benefits, the D.C. Circuit ruled in a strange case in which citizens sued the government seeking fewer benefits. They said their private insurers limit their coverage because they are eligible for Medicare.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.freetalklive.com/content/circuit_rejects_demand_fewer_benefits#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.freetalklive.com/category/additional_keywords_and_tags/medicaid">medicaid</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freetalklive.com/category/media_type/news_article">News Article</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freetalklive.com/category/additional_keywords_and_tags/rulings">rulings</category>
 <category domain="http://www.freetalklive.com/category/category/bureaucracy/social_security">Social Security</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>oracle2b</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">19555 at http://www.freetalklive.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Is government at all levels falling apart?</title>
 <link>http://www.freetalklive.com/content/government_all_levels_falling_apart</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Government services will be cut at every level. Potholes will deepen, infra-structure problems will worsen, pension plans will become insolvent, school systems will declare bankruptcy, police and fire protection will be reduced, etc. etc. You will be &quot;nickled and dimed&quot; in terms of new fees and taxes. Public unions will strike, providing further disruption. But when there are no funds, there is nothing to gain.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.freetalklive.com/content/government_all_levels_falling_apart#comments</comments>
 <category domain="