6

James Holmes may not have been wearing "body Armor" after all....

http://www.sfgate.com

James Holmes _may_ not have been wearing "body Armor" after all.... This matters because if true, then it would have been much easier for an armed defender to stop him. According to this article, "...despite its name, the urban assault vest is not bulletproof, but is simply a vest made for carrying accessories." This possibility needs further research. It is difficult because even days later, police do not seem to be releasing much specific information.

Read »
kelvin's picture
Created by kelvin 42 weeks 3 days ago – Made popular 42 weeks 3 days ago
Category: Firearms, Guns and Weapons   Tags:

Air Times & Contact

LIVE 7 Days a Week!
Mon-Sun: 7pm-10pm Eastern

Call toll-free:
1-855-450-FREE

You can also Skype us.

Free Talk Live 2.0

Welcome Free Talk Live 2.0!
 
You can login with your BBS username and password. Feel free to submit your favorite show prep suggestions, opinion pieces, video, audio, and questions here and vote up the entries you like! Here's a handy bookmarklet to make it easy.
 
Please report bugs here:Bugs.FreeTalkLive.com.

Who's online

There are currently 2 users and 56 guests online.

Online users

  • netmarketing1daddy
  • alan4coma

Recent comments